Carbon Voluntary MarketVoluntary carbon markets enable businesses, governments, nonprofit organizations, universities, municipalities, and individuals to offset their emissions.

When it comes to the Carbon Voluntary Market, according to the most recent analysis by Boston Consulting Group and Shell, the demand for carbon credits is significantly increasing in the voluntary carbon markets, even if the economy is struggling and there are still continuous financial constraints.

One of the report’s most important findings is the shift in emphasis within the carbon credit trading sector, from merely reducing emissions to completely eliminating them. This demonstrates the growing awareness of and dedication to meeting net-zero emissions targets across numerous businesses.

The carbon voluntary market research also contends that external organisations’ effect on consumers’ decision-making processes is growing.

Companies are giving more importance to making sure that the carbon credits they buy are supported by a reliable system for monitoring, reporting, and verification.

This demonstrates how accountability and openness are becoming increasingly important in the voluntary carbon market.

The Carbon Voluntary Market report also mentions that businesses are closely monitoring changes to Article 6 of the Paris Agreement as they attempt to modify their strategy.

This emphasises the constant requirement for businesses to remain knowledgeable about and responsive to the dynamic environment of the voluntary carbon market.

The research, in its whole, offers insightful information about the voluntary carbon market as it stands today, showing the rising demand for carbon credits as well as the evolving priorities and considerations of businesses as they work to meet their sustainability objectives.

By funding initiatives that lessen or remove carbon dioxide from the environment, companies can use carbon credits to offset their greenhouse gas emissions.

These credits can be purchased and sold on carbon markets like the Chicago Climate Exchange or the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) (CCX).

As more businesses set challenging targets to attain net zero emissions, using carbon credits in their sustainability and carbon reduction plans can help them meet these targets while additionally promoting the growth of clean energy projects.

Voluntary Carbon Market Choice

Companies can purchase credits on the voluntary market to offset their greenhouse gas emissions.  These credit options are as follows:

> Avoidance credits for initiatives like the construction of wind farms that stop emissions from being emitted.

> Credits for emission removal initiatives that use technological or natural methods to reduce emissions, such as afforestation or the production of renewable energy.

The term “voluntary carbon market” refers to the market for carbon offset credits, which are used to pay for initiatives that lessen or eliminate carbon dioxide emissions from the atmosphere in order to compensate for a company’s or person’s carbon emissions.

The market has experienced tremendous growth recently, with growth setting a record in 2021 and accelerating in 2022.  It is anticipated to keep expanding in the years to come, with forecasts indicating that it will total between $10 billion and $40 billion by 2030.

Boston Consulting Group conducted a global survey of more than 200 environmental and sustainability executives across sectors and in-depth interviews with more than 20 executives in order to better understand the effect of the current economic downturn on companies’ carbon-offset purchase strategies.

According to this excerpt, consumers think that even in the midst of economic difficulties, spending on carbon credits will increase as more businesses adopt net-zero goals.

Additionally, it shows that the demand for some carbon credit kinds, like credits based on nature, may soon outpace the supply.

> The decisions of consumers are increasingly influenced by outside entities. Companies anticipate that groups like the Science Based Targets project and the Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative will have a greater impact on market trends; as a result, market growth will likely be impacted by the emerging direction of these groups.

> An essential requirement for buying carbon offset credits is a reliable monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) framework. MRV makes sure that the credits bought have a measurable and verifiable impact and that the method used to create and sell the credits is legitimate and transparent. This is crucial for customers looking at the voluntary carbon market as it enables them to show their dedication to lowering their carbon footprint and dispels claims of greenwashing. MRV is ranked as a significant factor in credit purchasing decisions by more than 90% of consumers.

> Companies are increasingly utilising removal credits since they are thought to be of a higher calibre than avoidance credits. This is so that the effect of a removal project can be more easily verified. Technology-based removal techniques are anticipated to grow in popularity as it becomes more accessible and advances. Over half of the organisations surveyed anticipate that removal credits will rule their portfolios by 2030.

> The Paris Agreement’s Article 6 permits international collaboration to meet emissions reduction goals (NDCs). Although countries can trade carbon credits, only one can use the credits to meet its NDC. While corresponding modifications prevent double counting, they may have an impact on businesses seeking credit from outside. Article 6’s effects are unclear, and opinions differ on whether it will result in a worldwide compliance market.But in the following 5 years, it’s anticipated that a mechanism for corresponding changes will be put in place.

> The data indicates that avoidance credits presently account for an estimated 80% of the supply. But it’s anticipated that removal credits would rise significantly in the next years, reaching 35% by 2030. The Carbon Voluntary Market survey’s results, which point to an even more forceful transition, support this move toward elimination credits. Although the market is shifting toward removal credits, it appears premature to rely completely on them at this time given the state of the world’s emissions reduction efforts. Effective emission reduction is still a challenge for the world, and in certain cases, like with deforestation, we may even be making matters worse.

Forests are being destroyed much more quickly than any attempts to replant them. Therefore, rather than solely depending on removal credits, it is critical to provide programmes that strive to stop deforestation priority funding.

To successfully address the carbon budget, verifiable avoidance and removal programmes will be required. However, the quality of the credits should also be considered, not just their amount.

As the market for carbon credits develops, it is crucial to make sure that the credits sold are of a good calibre and adhere to predetermined norms and criteria.

The Removal-Avoidance Debate

According to this the Carbon Voluntary Market, has a growing number of businesses purchasing emissions credits demonstrates their commitment to being carbon neutral. But rather than depending solely on offsets, the main goal should be to reduce emissions. It is essential to confirm that the credits do, in fact, reduce emissions.

Catalyst Digital Energy is an award-winning energy consultancy with a focus on digital energy services, total energy contract lifecycle management and energy management services. It is revolutionising how businesses manage energy with its unique Energy Spend Management Platform, which is powered by Robotic Process Automation (RPA) EaaSi®.

Catalyst is digitising all aspects of energy, including billing, data, consumption, spend, payments, procurement and emissions reporting. When combined with its fully funded renewable energy solutions, Catalyst offers a unique and powerful approach to managing energy.